The Rushden Echo and Argus, 30th September 1955, transcribed by Jim Hollis
Wrong age group, say critics so no youth centre decision yet
Following an abortive meeting of social representatives at Rushden on Monday, the working of America’s youth centres is to be investigated by Mr. G. H. Denton, through whom a centre for the town was offered by American businessman Arthur Williams.
 |
|
It was time to discuss with the local authorities, so Mr Arthur Williams, the American businessman who has offered to provide Rushden with a youth centre, flew over from Boston, Mass., this week. “All I am here for,” he said, “is to get the older people to help the young people find themselves. We won’t need any wars if we bring up the children aright.” He was pleased with plans for transforming the old Moor Road school. Above, genial Mr Williams (left) is seen with Mr G H Denton, through whom his
offer was made.
|
Mr. Denton sails for New York tomorrow on a six-week business trip. While in America he will report fully to Mr. Williams on the opinions revealed last Monday.
He has also decided to make a full study of the centres or playgrounds provided by Mr. Williams for American children up to the age of 13.
The County Architect’s preliminary plan for the old Rushden Moor Road school and the equipment of adjoining ground for recreation was inspected by those who attended Monday’s meeting. Ald. Arthur Allebone presided and Mr. Williams was represented by Mr. Denton and Mr. Frank Brown.
Happy To Pay If …
Mr. Allebone told the meeting that Mr. Williams would be happy to pay for the centre to be prepared at a cost estimated at £6,000 provided that it fell in with his ideas. He had also intended to provide a regular contribution for maintenance, but technical difficulties had arisen to rule this out.
Some in Rushden had hoped that the centre would be for adolescents of 18 to 20 but Mr. Williams would not agree to the age limit being raised above 15. To run the centre might cost £1,000 a year, a sum that Mr. Williams thought could be raised easily by the town. No official grant could be expected in view of the age limitation.
“It is a very generous gesture,” said Mr. Allebone, adding: “I have heard it said that we do a great deal for the old people and nothing for youth.”
Mr. Denton said that Mr. Williams fully realised the problem of the later ages but knew the two groups would not mix satisfactorily. He wanted the children to be under supervision. The last thing he wished to do was to cut across any other activities, whether religious or secular.
A long debate, which included a ten-minute adjournment for private discussion, revealed fears that the plan would fail because the age group was wrong and that there would be a lack of voluntary workers to support a full-time superintendent. Some speakers claimed that Rushden had sufficient organisations for its children and young people.
“It seems like American baby-minding,” said Mr. R. R. Lawrence.
“There is a danger,” said Mr. L. C. Wilce, “that this expensive experiment would resolve into a local club for the younger ones in the immediate neighbourhood.
“I am sorry to disappoint such a generous man as Mr. Williams. What he has in mind is the American way of life with its early life social development.”
The Rev. A. B. Martin, curate of St. Mary’s, was a persistent critic.
Convinced
Mr. Don Bugby said Mr. Williams had convinced him of the value of work among those under 15.
At the height of the debate the chairman declared: “I am satisfied that if it was for the 15-20 group it would have gone straight ahead and been a grand scheme.”
It was finally agreed that no vote should be taken pending the report that Mr. Williams will receive.
On behalf of all present Mr. Norman expressed appreciation of Mr. Williams and his generous offer.
|