Wellingborough Petty Sessions Court
Midland Railway Cases
Israel Meadows, yard clerk, Rushden, was charged with larceny as a servant of the Midland Railway Company, by stealing one pair of boots value 10s.6d, the property of the said company, at Rushden, between July 21st and September 21st. Thomas Eaton, carman, Rushden, and Frederick Wm Evans, checker, Rushden, were charged with larceny as servants of the Midland Railway Company, by stealing eight dozen glace kid skins, valued at £13, the property of the said company, at Rushden, on or about August 12th. Ebenezer Cox, dealer, Rushden, was charged with receiving eight dozen skins, valued at £13, well knowing them to have been stolen, at Rushden, during the last two months.

Mr. R. J. Turner (Beale and Co., Birmingham) appeared for the Midland Railway, and Mr. J. C. Parker for the defence. Defendants evidently felt their position very keenly.

Mr Turner said in this case the prosecution desired a remand till Tuesday, on which day he understood their worships would be able to go into the cases. He hoped to have all the charges ready on that day. He asked that the cases might be adjourned till Tuesday at eleven o’clock. The Chairman asked if defendants had anything to say why they should not be remanded. Defendants offered no objection. Mr. Parker asked if the Bench would entertain the question of bail at that stage. The Chairman said they could not do so until after Tuesday next.

After the Beans
Three Rushden boys were charged with stealing about three gallons of beans, valued at 1s.6d., the property of Charles Edwin Knight, at Rushden on September 16th. Thos. A. Knight, brother of Charles Knight, said he saw the boys, one of whom was carrying a bag. They ran away when they saw him. He found that the stacks in the field had been pulled about, and the beans pulled off. P.S. Avery said he saw the boys separately, and the admitted taking the beans. Two of the boys were ordered to receive six strokes with the birch, and the other was fined 5s.

Alleged Compounding a Felony
John Ogden Wright, baker, Rushden, was charged that he did unlawfully compound a felony of 35, stolen by Arthur Boyce, at Rushden on or about August 12th. Mr. W. W. James prosecuted, and Mr. A. J. Darnell defended. Arthur Boyce, baker’s assistant, residing at 132, Twickenham-road, Leytonstone, said he had been in the employ of the defendant at Rushden. His duty was to deliver bread and receive money in payment. He had not handed over all the monies received to Mr. Wright.

When accused by Mr. Wright of not having paid all money he received, witness told his master he would pay him back, when he said, “I must have £3 now or I shall summon you”. Defendant also said witness must work out another £2 owing in monies not paid over. Harry Boyce, drayman, brother to the last witness, said Mr. Wright told him his brother had been robbing him right and left. Witness asked: “How much?” and he said, “About £5 as near as we can get it”. Witness promised to tell his father, who was a very strict man. He (witness) did not think he would pay. Defendant said, “If I cannot get £3 I shall have him locked up”. Charles Boyce, father of the youth, engine driver, Yelden, saw defendant on the evening of August 12th, and he was told that his son had robbed him of £5 or more. Witness said he was very sorry Defendant suggested that witness should lay down £3, and witness did so, and was given a receipt for the money. On August 31st he received a letter informing him that his son had run away, and asking him to go and see him. Witness did so, and defendant asked for a further 30s. Witness refused to pay any more. Mr. James said after that evidence he did not propose to call the inspector. After the statement of the last witness he felt that he could not succeed in getting a conviction for compounding a felony. Mr. Darnell said that that meant that his friend could not support the charge. He submitted that if anyone should be charged it should be the man who had just given evidence. He asked the Bench to dismiss the case. The Chairman said they would allow the case to be withdrawn. In answer to Mr. Darnell, the Chairman said they adhered to their decision to allow the case to be withdrawn, which was equivalent to a dismissal. Mr. Darnell thanked the Bench, and hoped the Press would make a note of it.

Notes of the Week – Topics of Local and General Interest - Rushden’s Great Need
The need of a Petty Sessional Court at Rushden – says the “Northampton Daily Chronicle” – is demonstrated practically every Friday, when a number of cases (mostly for minor or technical offences) are heard by the Bench sitting at Wellingborough. The penalty for offenders from Rushden – and of course, elsewhere in the district – is doubled by the inconvenience and loss of time necessitated by the attendance of defendants at Wellingboro’. A man who forgets his motor licence has his work dislocated for practically a day in order to answer summons; or a working man whose lamp goes out and who “chances his luck”, is made to lose a day’s pay, perhaps, as well as payng a fine. The matter had long been a grievance hugged by Rushden people, and the most strenuous efforts have been made by the Rushden Urban Council at various times to secure redress. All has been without avail, and the inadvertent wrong doers continue to suffer.

Charles Henry Dilley, shoehand, Rushden for not keeping a dog under control at night was fined 10s.

Three Rushden shoehands, two aged 14, the other 13, were summoned for stealing a 4lb box of caramels, value 6/8, the goods of Messrs Bell Bros. at Rushden on March 5, and a 14 year old boy was summoned for receiving 1lb of the caramels, knowing them to have been stolen. Harold Jarvis, salesman for Messrs. Bell Bros., Kettering, said he had a sweet stall on the Green, Rushden. He missed a box of caramels, the same as that now produced. P.S. Lawrence said that when questioned one boy asserted that he knew nothing about it, but later admitted he and the other two lads stole the box, and they divided the sweets and hid them. Witness accompanied the boy and found the sweets wrapped in handkerchiefs. The boy charged with receiving admitted he went to the others while they were dividing the sweets, and helped himself. The boys were placed under the probation officer for 18 months, the parents to pay 3/9 costs each.